![]() But for some people, it’s still not going to reach them.”Īlexander Keyssar, a professor of history and social policy at Harvard and author of “Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College?”, believes a full-fledged investigative commission, like the one that followed the Sept. “What I was hoping with the project was to put some very hard and fast facts together with people who can tell the story from a witness perspective. “I had people who were in the film texting me saying: ‘Why the hell didn’t you put that in your film? You’re liars,’” Roberts says. Some of those in the mob praised his film only to later complain after seeing Carlson’s series. Roberts interviewed witnesses and participants. Jamie Roberts’ HBO documentary “Four Hours at the Capitol” was motivated in part to firmly establish a visual chronology of that day, with the rampage following Trump’s incitement to his followers to “fight like hell.” To counter such misrepresentations, other documentary projects have tried to capture Jan. Carlson created a series on the riot that aired on Fox News’ subscription streaming service. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., has claimed the rioters were leftist militants “masquerading as Trump supporters.” Trump has continued to insist that the election - Biden won by a wide margin, with scant evidence of fraud - was the real insurrection.įox News host Tucker Carlson has attempted to frame the Capitol attack as a “false flag” operation, orchestrated by the FBI. ![]() Clyde, R-Ga., has described the siege as like “a normal tourist visit.” Rep. ![]() “Depending on your political point of view, the news channels you watch, what this meant to you, this memory is going to have a different slant based on the story that you tell yourself.”Īnd a lot of people have been working hard to chip away at the memory of Jan. So for these collective memories, we have a lot of chances to revisit them,” says Genova. “Outside influences can sneak in every time we revisit and recall a memory for what happened. Indeed, the act of remembering can be a highly mercurial thing - particularly when deep-seated political views are involved. The Capitol riot - the violent culmination of a bid to delegitimize the 2020 election and block its certification - has morphed into a partisan “Rashomon,” the classic Japanese film about a slaying told from varying and conflicting points of view. They failed.”īut since that day, separate versions - one factual, one fanciful - have taken hold. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., then the majority leader, said: “They tried to disrupt our democracy. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said then that “the president bears responsibility” for the attacks. 6 at the time and in its immediate aftermath. Such a disparity in memory may be inevitable in our hyper-polarized politics, but it’s striking given the stark clarity of Jan. A poll by The Associated Press and NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about 4 in 10 Republicans recall the attack - in which five people died - as violent, while 9 in 10 Democrats do. history, there is far from national consensus.Ī Quinnipiac poll found that 93% of Democrats considered it an attack on the government, but only 29% of Republicans agreed. Yet a year later, when it comes to a where-were-you moment in U.S. The violent storming of the Capitol by Donald Trump supporters bent on upending the election of Joe Biden was as clear as day: democracy under siege, live-streamed in real time. NEW YORK (AP) - Beneath a pale winter light and the glare of television cameras, it seemed hard not to see the Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |